Sexual abuse of three employees, entrepreneur acquitted after 8 years of trials: "Horrible accusations, family life destroyed"
Summary
An entrepreneur accused of sexual violence against three employees has been acquitted by the Milan Court of Appeal eight years after the investigations began.
Key Points
- The Milan Court of Appeal acquitted the entrepreneur because the fact did not exist in the Appeal bis trial.
- The Court of Cassation had annulled the previous conviction of seven years and six months for failure to admit technical expert reports.
- The defense highlighted discrepancies between telephone records and the testimonies of the injured parties.
- The accusers, who were civil parties, expressed bitterness and confirmed their versions of the facts.
The case and the judicial process
Pavia – An entrepreneur from Bubbiano, a town in the province of Milan, accused of sexual violence against three employees, has been acquitted, because the fact did not exist, by the Milan Court of Appeal. The sentence comes at the end of the Appeal bis trial and more than eight years after the first complaint, in January 2016, filed by one of the injured parties: "My client received the news of the acquittal with a liberating cry," comments the defendant's lawyer, Antonio Francesco Catanzariti.
The entrepreneur on trial, F.T., sixty-six years old, had been sentenced in 2020 to ten years of imprisonment in the first instance by the Court of Pavia, then in 2021 in the first Appeal trial the conviction had been confirmed but the sentence reduced to seven years and six months. The Court of Cassation in June 2022 had instead annulled the sentence with remand, thus ordering a second Appeal trial which concluded last Friday with a total overturning of the previous decisions.
The role of telephone records
At the center of the remand decided by the Cassation, was the failure to admit the expert report on telephone records. The defense of the accused, which also made use of a party consultancy, in its final discussion emphasized:
- Discrepancies between some data from the records and the statements provided by the injured parties.
- Contradictory points that make the story provided not credible.
"We await the reasons for the sentence to eventually evaluate the next actions to be taken – the lawyer anticipates –. My client suffered the loss of dignity, he spent difficult years. Being accused of such a horrible crime without having committed it makes one feel very bad, for a period even his family serenity was destroyed."
The reactions of the civil parties
According to the accusations initially made against the entrepreneur, the employees allegedly suffered groping and harassing behavior, one of them had reported being forced into a relationship: "My clients learned of the acquittal sentence with great bitterness – states lawyer Francesca Santini who assisted two of the three women, all of whom were civil parties in the trial -. They have always confirmed their version of the facts in all venues. We await the reasons for the decision to understand the situation, after which I will discuss with them any next steps."
From a technical point of view, now the Prosecutor's Office could appeal to the Cassation or the decision will become final.
Content drafted with the support of artificial intelligence tools and reviewed by the firm’s lawyers. More information
📰 Questo articolo è tratto da una fonte esterna.
Read the original articleAvv. Antonio Francesco Catanzariti
Legal Aid Italia
Ha letto l'articolo e ha bisogno di assistenza?
Lo Studio Legal Aid è a disposizione per una consulenza riservata. Risposta garantita entro 24 ore.
Legal Insight
Altri articoli dello Studio
Mandato di arresto europeo (MAE): radicamento in Italia e rifiuto della consegna
La Cassazione ribadisce che il termine dei cinque anni non è un dato orientativo ma una soglia legale, e che la sua verifica documentale resta terreno del giudice di merito.
LeggiConfisca a metà: la Cassazione boccia la doppia motivazione su profitto e sproporzione
Cass. pen., Sez. IV, 9 giugno 2026 (dep. 8 settembre 2026), n. 33026. La contraddizione tra confisca diretta e confisca per sproporzione è vizio autonomo, anche quando l'importo in gioco è modesto.
LeggiSequestro su rogatoria estera: l'art. 724 c.p.p. alla prova della Corte costituzionale
L'ordinanza del dott. Roberto Crepaldi, giudice per le indagini preliminari presso il Tribunale di Milano, apre la questione di legittimità costituzionale: manca un rimedio per contestare i.
Leggi