This site uses technical and third-party cookies to improve your browsing experience. Learn more

    Skyline di Milano — Italian Corporate Crimes Lawyer in Milan

    CORPORATE CRIMES · FINANCIAL & MARKET OFFENSES

    Italian Corporate Crimes Lawyer in Milan

    Specialist criminal defense for directors, statutory auditors, supervisory body members and executives in proceedings for false accounting, breach of fiduciary duty, obstruction of supervision and market abuses. Confidential consultation within 24 hours.

    Or contact us directly:

    Milano Centro Absolute Confidentiality Experience under Leg. Decree 231

    The situations we face every day

    The Firm assists entrepreneurs and directors daily in contexts of high criticality.

    False corporate communications

    Charges for false accounting (artt. 2621-2622 c.c.) often rely on balance sheet valuations challengeable with expert technical reports.

    Consob market abuse proceedings

    Insider trading and market manipulation are punished up to 12 years imprisonment: defense requires specific expertise in financial criminal law.

    Breach of fiduciary duty

    Intra-group operations and conflicts of interest can be challenged as breach of fiduciary duty (art. 2634 c.c.) with penalties up to 3 years.

    Obstruction of supervisory functions

    Sanctions for obstruction of supervisory functions (art. 2638 c.c.) reach €100,000 and 4 years: relevant for directors of supervised entities.

    How we protect you

    01

    Defense during Consob/GdF investigation

    Assistance from the investigation commencement notice, access to records, defense brief and adversarial process with inspection bodies.

    02

    Balance sheet expert and valuation analysis

    Support of auditors and accounting experts to challenge balance sheet valuations contested as false corporate communications.

    03

    Insider trading and market abuse defense

    Analysis of information flows, demonstration of absence of privileged information and challenge of causality in market abuse.

    04

    Full representation to Supreme Court

    Integrated representation at all levels of proceedings, with specialization in legitimacy issues on financial crimes.

    Corporate crimes are governed by arts. 2621-2641 of the Civil Code and the TUF (D.Lgs. 58/1998) for market offenses. They concern directors, general managers, statutory auditors, liquidators and auditors. Penalties range from 6 months to 12 years for the most serious offenses (market abuse).

    Main corporate offenses table

    OffenseArticlePenalty
    False accounting (unlisted)art. 2621 c.c.1–5 years
    False accounting (listed)art. 2622 c.c.3–8 years
    Breach of fiduciary dutyart. 2634 c.c.6 months – 3 years
    Obstruction of supervisionart. 2638 c.c.1–4 years

    Market abuse offenses (MAR + TUF)

    Insider trading (art. 184 TUF) is punished by imprisonment from 2 to 12 years and a fine up to €3M. Market manipulation (art. 185 TUF) with imprisonment from 1 to 12 years. The MAR Regulation (EU n. 596/2014) extended the scope to OTC instruments and SME growth markets. Consob is an active party in investigations and defense must deal with the dual sanctioning track (criminal + administrative).

    Defense strategies in corporate crimes

    • Challenge materiality of accounting misstatements with expert reports
    • Demonstrate absence of specific intent to deceive investors
    • Challenge the existence of privileged information in insider trading
    • Verify existence of undue advantage in breach of fiduciary duty
    • Activate plea bargaining for offenses with reduced punishability thresholds

    Recent cases successfully resolved

    Case A – AIM listed company

    False accounting for overvaluation of shareholdings in consolidated balance sheet.

    Full acquittal: balance sheet expert demonstrated correctness of valuation methodology adopted.

    Case B – M&A transaction

    Insider trading contested in M&A acquisition. Risk of 8 years.

    Acquittal: absence of privileged information demonstrated through information flow analysis.

    Case C – Holding and subsidiaries

    Breach of fiduciary duty in intra-group operations: asset transfer at non-market conditions.

    Reclassification with acquittal. Intra-group compensating advantages demonstrated.

    The Firm's Method

    1

    Initial confidential consultation

    First meeting within 24 hours: case analysis, risk assessment and defense strategy.

    2

    File access and technical analysis

    Access to the investigation file, appointment of expert witnesses, in-depth documentary and financial analysis.

    3

    Tailored defense strategy

    Preparation of defense briefs, precautionary applications, appeals to the Liberty Court or pre-notitia criminis interventions.

    4

    Representation at all court levels

    Representation at trial, appeal and Supreme Court; parallel management of any 231 proceedings.

    Our Team

    Avv. Roberto Antonio Catanzariti – Penalista d'impresa a Milano

    Avv. Roberto Antonio Catanzariti

    Fondatore e amministratore unico

    Avv. Donatella Conicella – Of Counsel Legal Aid, diritto societario e tributario

    Avv. Donatella Conicella

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Antonio Francesco Catanzariti – Avvocato penalista Legal Aid Milano

    Avv. Antonio Francesco Catanzariti

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Luana Bozza – Avvocato penalista Milano, libertà personale

    Avv. Luana Bozza

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Luana Simonetti – Avvocato penalista, misure cautelari ed esecuzione

    Avv. Luana Simonetti

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Marialoreta Corsi – Reati tributari e misure cautelari reali

    Avv. Marialoreta Corsi

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Who can be charged with corporate crimes?
    Directors (executive and non-executive), general managers, statutory auditors, liquidators, legal auditors. In some cases, also the CFO and function managers who participated in the preparation of the balance sheet or false communications.
    What is 'privileged information' in insider trading?
    Precise, non-public information that if made public would have a significant effect on the price of financial instruments (art. 7 MAR). The defense can challenge the 'precision', 'significance' or the defendant's lack of knowledge of such information.
    Is the statutory auditor liable for directors' crimes?
    Only if they were aware and failed to prevent the offense despite being able to do so (omissive concurrence). The auditor's defense revolves around the effective exercise of supervisory powers and the inexigibility of prevention.
    Can Consob act in parallel with the Prosecutor?
    Yes. The dual sanctioning track provides for Consob administrative sanctions (up to €5M or 15% of turnover) parallel to the criminal trial. However, the ECtHR (Grande Stevens v. Italy) imposed limitations on bis in idem for substantially criminal sanctions.
    What to do if the company receives an information request from Consob?
    Respond with specialized legal assistance: every statement can be used in subsequent sanctioning or criminal proceedings. The lawyer evaluates the completeness and correctness of the response while minimizing exposure.
    What is the statute of limitations for corporate crimes?
    Varies by offense: for false accounting of listed companies (art. 2622, max 8 years) the statute is 10 years. For insider trading (max 12 years) it reaches 15 years. The Cartabia reform introduced inadmissibility for time lapse in appeal and Supreme Court.

    Don't wait for the situation to worsen

    Contact us now for a confidential, no-obligation consultation.

    Or contact us directly: