This site uses technical and third-party cookies to improve your browsing experience. Learn more

    Skyline di Milano — Italian 231 Compliance & Entity Defense in Milan

    D.LGS. 231/2001 · CORPORATE COMPLIANCE & DEFENSE

    Italian 231 Compliance & Entity Defense in Milan

    Drafting and update of organization, management and control models. Supervisory Board support. Entity defense in 231 proceedings. Confidential consultation within 24 hours.

    Or contact us directly:

    Milano Centro Absolute Confidentiality Experience under Leg. Decree 231

    The situations we face every day

    The Firm assists entrepreneurs and directors daily in contexts of high criticality.

    Risk of interdictory sanctions

    Suspension of activities, license revocation, ban on PA contracts, exclusion from public funding: devastating consequences for business continuity.

    Heavy monetary sanctions

    Up to 1,500 quotas (~€2.3M): significant risk of multi-million sanctions for the entity must be managed with an effective 231 Model.

    Confiscation of crime profit

    Mandatory confiscation even by equivalent: may compromise business continuity if timely defense is not in place.

    Formally adopted but ineffective MOG

    A merely formal model without effective implementation equals absence: no exculpatory effect. Adequacy verification is essential.

    How we protect you

    01

    Custom 231 Models drafting

    Analysis of entity-specific risks, mapping of sensitive processes, drafting of MOG and Ethics Code calibrated on actual activities.

    02

    Update and periodic audit

    Model revision following regulatory changes (new predicate offenses), organizational changes or results of internal/external audits.

    03

    Supervisory Board support

    Assistance in establishing the OdV, drafting internal regulations, information flows and managing whistleblower reports.

    04

    Entity defense in criminal proceedings

    Entity representation in criminal proceedings under art. 35 D.Lgs. 231/2001, with strategies to demonstrate MOG adequacy and the offender's autonomous initiative.

    D.Lgs. 231/2001 introduced administrative liability of entities for crimes committed in their interest or advantage by top-level subjects or subordinates. The only exculpation: adoption and effective implementation of an Organization, Management and Control Model (MOG) suitable to prevent the offense, supervised by an autonomous Supervisory Body (OdV).

    Main predicate offenses

    Offense categoryArt. D.Lgs. 231/2001Max quota sanction
    Corruption and PA crimesart. 25800 quotas
    Cybercrimeart. 24-bis700 quotas
    Corporate crimesart. 25-ter1,000 quotas
    Negligent manslaughter at workart. 25-septies1,500 quotas + interdiction
    Tax crimesart. 25-quinquiesdecies500 quotas

    The exculpation: effective MOG + vigilant OdV

    To obtain exculpation, the entity must demonstrate: (1) adoption of the MOG before the commission of the offense; (2) model's suitability to prevent the type of offense committed; (3) entrusting supervision to an autonomous OdV with initiative and control powers; (4) fraudulent circumvention of the model by the offender.

    Applicable sanctions to the entity

    • Monetary fines up to 1,500 quotas (€258–€1,549 per quota)
    • Disqualification from business activities
    • Suspension or revocation of permits, licenses or concessions
    • Ban on contracting with public administration
    • Exclusion from public grants, funding or subsidies
    • Publication of conviction sentence

    Recent cases successfully resolved

    Case A – Manufacturing company

    231 proceedings for corruption offenses by top-level manager. Risk of business interdiction sanctions.

    MOG recognized as adequate by the Court. Entity acquitted. No sanction applied.

    Case B – Milan services company

    Extension of tax crimes to 231 (2019): existing MOG did not cover new predicate offenses.

    Urgent MOG update with specific tax protocols. Proceedings avoided.

    Case C – Financial holding

    Gap analysis of existing MOG on money laundering and anti-money laundering.

    Updated MOG, improved legal rating, strengthened banking relationships.

    The Firm's Method

    1

    Initial confidential consultation

    First meeting within 24 hours: case analysis, risk assessment and defense strategy.

    2

    File access and technical analysis

    Access to the investigation file, appointment of expert witnesses, in-depth documentary and financial analysis.

    3

    Tailored defense strategy

    Preparation of defense briefs, precautionary applications, appeals to the Liberty Court or pre-notitia criminis interventions.

    4

    Representation at all court levels

    Representation at trial, appeal and Supreme Court; parallel management of any 231 proceedings.

    Our Team

    Avv. Roberto Antonio Catanzariti – Penalista d'impresa a Milano

    Avv. Roberto Antonio Catanzariti

    Fondatore e amministratore unico

    Avv. Donatella Conicella – Of Counsel Legal Aid, diritto societario e tributario

    Avv. Donatella Conicella

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Antonio Francesco Catanzariti – Avvocato penalista Legal Aid Milano

    Avv. Antonio Francesco Catanzariti

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Luana Bozza – Avvocato penalista Milano, libertà personale

    Avv. Luana Bozza

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Luana Simonetti – Avvocato penalista, misure cautelari ed esecuzione

    Avv. Luana Simonetti

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Marialoreta Corsi – Reati tributari e misure cautelari reali

    Avv. Marialoreta Corsi

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is D.Lgs. 231/2001 and who does it affect?
    It is the decree that introduced administrative (de facto criminal) liability of collective entities — companies, associations, consortia — for offenses committed in their interest or advantage by top-level subjects (directors, managers) or by those under their supervision.
    Does an adopted 231 Model always protect the entity?
    No. The model must be: adopted before the offense, suitable to prevent the type of offense committed, effectively implemented (not merely formal), supervised by an autonomous OdV with real powers. A 'paper' model produces no exculpatory effects.
    How often should the 231 Model be updated?
    Whenever there are changes in: predicate offenses (the legislator regularly adds new ones), the entity's organizational structure, sensitive processes, or following audits and OdV reports. A full annual review is best practice.
    Can the OdV be a single-member body?
    In SMEs, yes: Confindustria and case law admit a single-member OdV (also the Board of Auditors or a qualified external professional). In large or listed companies, a collegial body with internal and external members is preferable.
    What are the most relevant predicate offenses for SMEs?
    Tax crimes (art. 25-quinquiesdecies, since 2019), corruption in commercial relations (art. 25), corporate crimes (art. 25-ter), negligent manslaughter and injuries from workplace accidents (art. 25-septies) and, for SMEs with international supply chains, money laundering (art. 25-octies).
    What happens to the entity if convicted under D.Lgs. 231?
    The entity faces monetary sanctions (up to €2.3M), interdictory sanctions (up to 2 years or permanently), confiscation of crime profit and, in the most serious cases, publication of the sentence. Interdictory sanctions can irreparably compromise business continuity.

    Don't wait for the situation to worsen

    Contact us now for a confidential, no-obligation consultation.

    Or contact us directly: