Biennial Preventive Agreement 2025–2026: opportunities and risks for businesses
Summary
The Biennial Preventive Agreement 2025–2026 offers businesses and professionals the opportunity to agree on taxable income, achieving fiscal stability.
Key Points
- Definition of the Biennial Preventive Agreement (Concordato Preventivo Biennale) as a tool for income crystallization.
- Innovations of the 2025–2026 reform, including the extension of the audience and special regularization (ravvedimento speciale).
- Analysis of the advantages in terms of fiscal rating and risks related to the rigidity of the agreement.
- Importance of a preventive assessment to avoid paying taxes on income not earned.
The tax reform has confirmed and extended the institution of the Biennial Preventive Agreement (CPB) also for the two-year period 2025–2026, strengthening its role as a compliance and tax planning tool.
This is an innovative measure, which allows businesses and professionals to agree in advance with the Agenzia delle Entrate (Italian Revenue Agency) on taxable income and related taxes for two years, obtaining certainty and stability.
WHAT IS THE BIENNIAL PREVENTIVE AGREEMENT
The CPB allows for the “crystallization” of the taxable income agreed upon with the Agenzia delle Entrate.
In practice:
- If you adhere, for two years your taxes are determined based on the established income;
- The Agency cannot assess a different income, except in cases of fraud or serious violations;
- You therefore obtain fiscal certainty and less exposure to controls.
INNOVATIONS OF THE 2025–2026 REFORM
The amendments approved in 2025 have introduced important innovations:
- Extension of the audience: businesses and professionals subject to ISA (Synthetic Reliability Indicators), with revenues up to 5.16 million, can adhere. Those under the flat-rate regime (forfettari) are excluded.
- Special regularization (ravvedimento speciale) 2019–2023: those who adhere to the CPB can regularize past years with reduced penalties, strengthening compliance.
- Adherence deadline: by September 30, 2025, using a telematic model prepared by the Agency.
- Tax benefits: certainty on income and taxes, reduction of the risk of assessments, greater solidity in relations with banks and investors.
- Causes of forfeiture: exclusion if payments are not respected or if serious violations emerge.
ADVANTAGES
- Stability and predictability of the tax burden for two years.
- Reduction of the risk of assessments and disputes.
- Improvement of the fiscal rating and reliability towards banks, partners, and investors.
- Possibility to close previous tax positions with the special regularization (ravvedimento speciale).
RISKS AND CRITICAL ISSUES
- If the real income is lower than the agreed income, the company will still pay more.
- Adherence is binding for two years, with no possibility of renegotiation if the market deteriorates.
- Some taxpayers are excluded (forfettari (flat-rate regime taxpayers), those with serious violations).
- The Agency retains control powers in cases of fraud or irregularities.
THE ROLE OF LEGAL AID
The CPB is not an automatic choice: it must be carefully evaluated based on the economic situation and business prospects.
Legal Aid assists businesses and professionals with:
- Preventive analysis of the convenience of the CPB;
- Evaluation of criminal-tax risks (Legislative Decree 74/2000);
- Support regarding liability 231;
- Defense in case of tax or criminal disputes.
CONCLUSION
The Biennial Preventive Agreement 2025–2026 is an important opportunity for tax planning and legal certainty, but it hides pitfalls for those who adhere without accurate analysis.
The key is to transform it into a conscious governance tool, capable of ensuring stability and reducing legal and reputational risks.
Content drafted with the support of artificial intelligence tools and reviewed by the firm’s lawyers. More information
Attached Documents
Avv. Roberto Antonio Catanzariti
Legal Aid Italia
Ha letto l'articolo e ha bisogno di assistenza?
Lo Studio Legal Aid è a disposizione per una consulenza riservata. Risposta garantita entro 24 ore.
Legal Insight
Altri articoli dello Studio
Mandato di arresto europeo (MAE): radicamento in Italia e rifiuto della consegna
La Cassazione ribadisce che il termine dei cinque anni non è un dato orientativo ma una soglia legale, e che la sua verifica documentale resta terreno del giudice di merito.
LeggiConfisca a metà: la Cassazione boccia la doppia motivazione su profitto e sproporzione
Cass. pen., Sez. IV, 9 giugno 2026 (dep. 8 settembre 2026), n. 33026. La contraddizione tra confisca diretta e confisca per sproporzione è vizio autonomo, anche quando l'importo in gioco è modesto.
LeggiSequestro su rogatoria estera: l'art. 724 c.p.p. alla prova della Corte costituzionale
L'ordinanza del dott. Roberto Crepaldi, giudice per le indagini preliminari presso il Tribunale di Milano, apre la questione di legittimità costituzionale: manca un rimedio per contestare i.
Leggi