This site uses technical and third-party cookies to improve your browsing experience. Learn more

    Skyline di Milano — Italian Counterfeiting Defense Lawyer in Milan

    COUNTERFEITING · COMMERCIAL FRAUD · TRADEMARK PROTECTION

    Italian Counterfeiting Defense Lawyer in Milan

    Specialist criminal defense in proceedings for trademark counterfeiting, introduction of goods bearing false marks, commercial fraud and sale of non-genuine industrial products. Confidential consultation within 24 hours.

    Or contact us directly:

    Milano Centro Absolute Confidentiality Experience under Leg. Decree 231

    The situations we face every day

    The Firm assists entrepreneurs and directors daily in contexts of high criticality.

    Warehouse and customs goods seizure

    Warehouse or border seizure can block business operations: the review must be filed within 10 days of execution.

    Aggravated art. 474 c.p. charge

    Introduction of products bearing counterfeit marks into national territory is punished up to 4 years: recidivism and aggravating factors can significantly increase the penalty.

    Luxury brand reports and civil actions

    LVMH, Kering and other luxury groups systematically activate the Customs Agency and GdF: defense must act on multiple fronts (criminal, civil, customs).

    E-commerce and dropshipping liability

    Online sellers who unknowingly market counterfeit products face criminal liability: good faith must be demonstrated with precise documentation.

    How we protect you

    01

    Review of customs or warehouse seizure

    Review application to the Liberty Court within 10 days, with documentation on goods origin and absence of the subjective element.

    02

    Good faith subjective element defense

    Demonstration of good faith purchase through invoices, customs documentation, supplier correspondence and authenticity certifications.

    03

    Management of criminal-civil dual track

    Coordination of criminal defense strategy with civil strategy (opposition to civil law seizures, brand owner damage claims).

    04

    Defense for e-commerce operators

    Supply chain analysis, review of contracts with Chinese or foreign suppliers and setting up compliance protocols to avoid future claims.

    Counterfeiting crimes are governed by arts. 473-474 c.p. (trademark and distinctive sign counterfeiting) and arts. 515-517 c.p. (commercial fraud, sale of industrial products with misleading marks). The subjective element — awareness of the counterfeit nature of the goods — is central to the defense strategy.

    Regulatory framework

    OffenseArt. c.p.Penalty
    Trademark and sign counterfeitingart. 4736 months – 3 years
    Introduction of products with false marksart. 4741–4 years
    Commercial fraudart. 515up to 2 years
    Sale with misleading marksart. 517up to 2 years

    Preventive seizures and review

    Warehouse or consignment seizures are common in counterfeiting crimes. The review application to the Liberty Court must be filed within 10 days of execution. Typical grounds for acceptance: absence of subjective element (good faith in purchase), formal defects in the order, disproportion between seizure and charge.

    Subjective element: good faith and lack of awareness

    The counterfeiting offense requires awareness of the counterfeit or non-genuine nature of the product. Good faith purchase, documented by regular invoices, supply contracts and commercial correspondence, excludes intent. Many e-commerce and wholesale operators are unjustly involved in proceedings based on goods purchased without knowledge of counterfeiting.

    Recent cases successfully resolved

    Case A – Textile importer

    Seizure of 15,000 clothing items with counterfeit marks. Aggravated art. 474 c.p.

    Review accepted. Good faith demonstrated with customs documentation. Case dismissed.

    Case B – Online marketplace seller

    Charge for selling counterfeit luxury accessories on e-commerce platform. Account seizure.

    Acquittal for absence of intent. Third-party supplier identified as responsible.

    Case C – Accessories manufacturer

    Art. 473 c.p.: production of bags with signs similar to registered trademarks. Machinery seizure.

    Favorable plea bargain. Machinery partially returned. Reduced fine.

    The Firm's Method

    1

    Initial confidential consultation

    First meeting within 24 hours: case analysis, risk assessment and defense strategy.

    2

    File access and technical analysis

    Access to the investigation file, appointment of expert witnesses, in-depth documentary and financial analysis.

    3

    Tailored defense strategy

    Preparation of defense briefs, precautionary applications, appeals to the Liberty Court or pre-notitia criminis interventions.

    4

    Representation at all court levels

    Representation at trial, appeal and Supreme Court; parallel management of any 231 proceedings.

    Our Team

    Avv. Roberto Antonio Catanzariti – Penalista d'impresa a Milano

    Avv. Roberto Antonio Catanzariti

    Fondatore e amministratore unico

    Avv. Donatella Conicella – Of Counsel Legal Aid, diritto societario e tributario

    Avv. Donatella Conicella

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Antonio Francesco Catanzariti – Avvocato penalista Legal Aid Milano

    Avv. Antonio Francesco Catanzariti

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Luana Bozza – Avvocato penalista Milano, libertà personale

    Avv. Luana Bozza

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Luana Simonetti – Avvocato penalista, misure cautelari ed esecuzione

    Avv. Luana Simonetti

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Avv. Marialoreta Corsi – Reati tributari e misure cautelari reali

    Avv. Marialoreta Corsi

    Of Counsel | Legal Aid – Società tra Avvocati S.r.l.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Is unknowingly selling counterfeit products a crime?
    No, if good faith in the purchase is demonstrated. Counterfeiting crimes (arts. 473-474 c.p.) require awareness of the counterfeit nature of the goods. Regular purchase documentation (invoices, delivery notes, contracts) is essential to demonstrate absence of intent.
    What to do when Customs seizes goods?
    Contact a lawyer immediately. The deadline for review application is 10 days from execution of seizure. Collect all purchase documentation (invoices, supplier contracts, authenticity certifications). Do not make spontaneous statements to investigators.
    Is a dropshipper liable for a supplier's counterfeit products?
    Only if aware of the counterfeiting. A dropshipper who sells products from a third-party supplier without physically examining them can invoke good faith, provided they demonstrate they adopted reasonable precautions in supplier selection.
    How long does a preventive seizure last in a counterfeiting case?
    Until the outcome of criminal proceedings, unless a review is accepted or seizure lifted for supervening irrelevance. Timely review is the only tool to obtain quick return of goods, especially if seizure blocks the commercial cycle.
    Does counterfeiting also trigger 231 entity liability?
    Yes. Counterfeiting crimes (arts. 473-474 c.p.) are predicate offenses for administrative liability under D.Lgs. 231/2001 (art. 25-bis). The entity can be sanctioned with monetary and interdictory penalties if the crimes are committed in its interest or advantage.
    Is it possible to reach an agreement with the brand owner to avoid trial?
    Civil conciliation with the brand owner does not extinguish the criminal offense, but can positively affect penalty determination (damage compensation mitigating factor) and reduce the risk of civil party participation in the trial.

    Don't wait for the situation to worsen

    Contact us now for a confidential, no-obligation consultation.

    Or contact us directly: