This site uses technical and third-party cookies to improve your browsing experience. Learn more

    Corporate and financial crimes: concluding framework

    Corporate crimes and financial market crimes constitute the most sensitive nucleus of economic criminal law, standing at the crossroads between: correctness of corporate information; integrity and transparency of markets; protection of capital and creditors; effectiveness of controls and supervisory functions.

    Corporate and financial crimes: concluding framework

    Corporate crimes and financial market crimes constitute the most sensitive nucleus of economic criminal law, standing at the crossroads between: correctness of corporate information; integrity and transparency of markets; protection of capital and creditors; effectiveness of controls and supervisory functions.

    The integration between Civil Code regulation, financial legislation and the system of administrative liability of entities under Legislative Decree 231/2001 — within the framework harmonised by the European MAR Regulation — produces a systemic effect: every governance choice, every disclosure policy and every management of inside information can produce simultaneous consequences: on the level of individual criminal liability of officers; on the level of entity liability; on the economic-financial and reputational stability of the company.

    In this context, corporate criminal defence cannot be limited to challenging the historical facts, but must govern corporate, financial and organisational profiles in an integrated manner, ensuring compliance with the principles of legality, culpability and personal responsibility.

    It is at this intersection between criminal law, governance and markets that the quality of specialist assistance is measured.

    Competenze correlate

    Bancarotta e Reati della Crisi d'ImpresaReati TributariReati PrevidenzialiResponsabilità Amministrativa degli Enti – D.Lgs. 231/2001Riciclaggio e Reati Economico PatrimonialiContraffazione e Tutela Penale della Proprietà Industriale

    Approfondimenti correlati

    Estradizioni e Mandati di ArrestoMandato di arresto europeo (MAE): radicamento in Italia e rifiuto della consegnaRiciclaggio e Reati Economico PatrimonialiConfisca a metà: la Cassazione boccia la doppia motivazione su profitto e sproporzioneRiciclaggio e Reati Economico PatrimonialiSequestro su rogatoria estera: l'art. 724 c.p.p. alla prova della Corte costituzionale

    Frequently asked questions about Corporate, Financial and Market Crimes

    When do false corporate communications have criminal relevance?
    False corporate communications become criminally relevant when misrepresentations in financial statements or other corporate communications exceed the materiality thresholds under Article 2621 of the Civil Code and are capable of misleading others. The defence focuses on distinguishing discretionary accounting choices from criminally relevant misrepresentation, and verifying the actual deceptive capacity of the conduct.
    How is self-laundering distinguished from money laundering in the corporate context?
    Self-laundering (Article 648-ter.1 of the Criminal Code) punishes those who use or transfer proceeds from their own offences in economic or financial activities, obstructing their identification. It differs from money laundering in that the active party is the same person who committed the predicate offence. The defence analyses the origin of funds, the characterisation of transactions, and the distinction between productive use and criminally relevant conduct.
    What are the liability profiles of corporate supervisory bodies?
    Members of the board of statutory auditors, the supervisory board, and auditors may be held liable for failure to supervise when their passive conduct has allowed or facilitated corporate offences. Liability requires proof of a qualified omission, knowledge of the irregular situation, and a causal link between the omission and the damage caused.
    What is market manipulation and when is it criminally relevant?
    Market manipulation (Article 2637 of the Civil Code and Article 185 of the Consolidated Finance Act) punishes the dissemination of false information and the carrying out of simulated transactions capable of significantly altering the price of financial instruments or commodities. The defence verifies the actual deceptive capacity of the contested communications, their effective dissemination to the market, and the subjective element of specific intent to manipulate the market.
    How does the defence work in insider trading proceedings?
    Insider trading (Article 184 of the Consolidated Finance Act) punishes those who, possessing inside information, carry out transactions in financial instruments or communicate such information to third parties. The defence focuses on whether the information qualifies as inside information (precise, non-public, and price-sensitive nature), proof of specific intent, and the distinction between the use of inside information and normal market analysis.

    Request a confidential consultation

    Every request is handled with the utmost discretion and professional confidentiality.

    All expertise areas