This site uses technical and third-party cookies to improve your browsing experience. Learn more

    Prevention & Governance

    In the system outlined by Legislative Decree 231/2001, prevention is not limited to drafting an organisational model, but translates into a structural framework for governing criminal risk.

    Strategic Prevention and Criminal Governance

    In the system outlined by Legislative Decree 231/2001, prevention is not limited to drafting an organisational model, but translates into a structural framework for governing criminal risk.

    A 231 system correctly designed and concretely implemented:

    • reduces exposure to the risk of committing offences in sensitive areas
    • strengthens the quality of decision-making processes and internal controls
    • has a decisive impact on the judicial assessment of the entity in the event of proceedings
    • limits the risk of application of potentially paralysing interdictory sanctions
    • protects corporate reputation and the company's reliability towards stakeholders, credit institutions and institutional partners

    231 compliance is not a merely formal fulfilment, but a safeguard of asset stability and operational continuity. The difference is not measured in the adoption of the model, but in its effective integration into business processes.

    Legal Aid – Specialist Defence in Proceedings under Legislative Decree 231/2001

    In the field of administrative liability of entities, the defence in proceedings under Legislative Decree 231/2001 requires:

    • specialisation in corporate criminal law
    • experience in managing highly complex 231 proceedings
    • capacity for timely intervention at the interdictory precautionary stage
    • strategic coordination between the defence of the entity, the defence of natural persons and the governance structure
    • competence in structuring and substantively verifying adequate and effectively implemented 231 Models

    Legal Aid operates in economic criminal law with a specialist and systemic approach, oriented towards governing criminal risk and protecting corporate governance.

    In the 231 system, leadership is not measured in the mere documentary preparation of the organisational model, but in the ability to face criminal proceedings with technical rigour, strategic vision and full awareness of the operational repercussions for the business.

    Competenze correlate

    Bancarotta e Reati della Crisi d'ImpresaReati TributariReati PrevidenzialiReati Societari, Finanziari e di MercatoRiciclaggio e Reati Economico PatrimonialiContraffazione e Tutela Penale della Proprietà Industriale

    Approfondimenti correlati

    Compliance 231Confisca del profitto e responsabilità 231: la Cassazione delimita l'applicazione del principio Massini nei rapporti tra ente e autore del reatoCommenti e novità giuridichePNRR e responsabilità penale nella fase di chiusura del piano: controlli, fattispecie e tutela preventiva dell'impresaEstradizioni e Mandati di ArrestoMandato di arresto europeo (MAE): radicamento in Italia e rifiuto della consegna

    Frequently asked questions about Administrative Liability of Entities – Legislative Decree 231/2001

    What is corporate administrative liability under Legislative Decree 231/2001?
    Legislative Decree 231/2001 introduces an autonomous imputation framework alongside individual criminal liability: a company may be held liable for offences committed in its interest or for its benefit by senior management or subordinates. Sanctions include financial penalties, interdictory measures and confiscation, with direct effects on business continuity.
    How is the adequacy of an Organisational Model 231 assessed?
    The Organisational, Management and Control Model (MOG) is the exculpatory tool provided by Legislative Decree 231/2001. Its adequacy requires an effective mapping of crime risks, adequate control protocols, an autonomous Supervisory Board, and ongoing training. Adequacy is not measured on paper but on the model's substantial ability to prevent predicate offences.
    What interdictory precautionary measures can affect an entity?
    In 231 proceedings, a company may be subject to interdictory precautionary measures such as suspension of activities, prohibition from contracting with public authorities, exclusion from public subsidies and financing, and prohibition from advertising goods and services. The defence verifies the existence of serious indicia of liability and the concrete risk of reoffending.
    How is the Supervisory Board structured and what are its requirements?
    The Supervisory Board (OdV) must have autonomy, independence, professional competence and continuity of action. It may be single-member or collegial; in SMEs, it may coincide with the board of statutory auditors. The OdV supervises the effectiveness of the Model, receives reports, proposes updates and reports to corporate bodies. Its composition and functioning directly affect the exculpatory defence under Legislative Decree 231/2001.
    Does the Model 231 also protect small and medium enterprises?
    Legislative Decree 231/2001 applies to all entities — including SMEs — that have legal personality or are otherwise endowed with autonomous assets. For SMEs, a simplified OdV structure (even single-member) is permitted, and a Model proportionate to the size and operational complexity of the entity is acceptable. A poorly calibrated or merely formal Model may not produce the exculpatory effect, exposing the company to sanctions.

    Request a confidential consultation

    Every request is handled with the utmost discretion and professional confidentiality.

    All expertise areas