Defence Strategy
The defence of the entity in proceedings under Legislative Decree 231/2001 requires an integrated approach, capable of combining criminal, organisational and corporate expertise.
Defence Strategy in Proceedings under Legislative Decree 231/2001
The defence of the entity in proceedings under Legislative Decree 231/2001 requires an integrated approach, capable of combining criminal, organisational and corporate expertise.
The heart of the strategy lies in the analysis of organisational fault, the true centre of gravity of the entity's attribution.
Intervention at the precautionary stage
The defence action focuses on:
- challenging the existence of organisational fault
- verification of the absence of interest or benefit of the entity
- demonstration of the adequacy and effective implementation of the organisational model
- reconstruction of the concrete activity of the Supervisory Body
- request for alternative or corrective measures suitable to preserve business operations
Defence in the merits proceedings
On the merits, the strategy is structured on multiple levels:
- analysis of the predicate offence and challenge of its constituent elements
- verification of the link between the conduct of the offender and the organisational structure of the entity
- demonstration that the model was adequate and that the offence was possibly committed through fraudulent circumvention thereof
- strategic coordination between the defence of the entity and the defence of the natural persons involved
The central point of the defence
In the 231 system, the dividing line between liability and non-punishability lies in the ability to demonstrate:
- the adequacy of the organisational structure
- the effectiveness of internal controls
- the absence of a qualified benefit for the entity
- the possible fraudulent circumvention of the model
It is on this ground that the quality of the defence is measured.
Approfondimenti correlati
Compliance 231Confisca del profitto e responsabilità 231: la Cassazione delimita l'applicazione del principio Massini nei rapporti tra ente e autore del reatoCommenti e novità giuridichePNRR e responsabilità penale nella fase di chiusura del piano: controlli, fattispecie e tutela preventiva dell'impresaEstradizioni e Mandati di ArrestoMandato di arresto europeo (MAE): radicamento in Italia e rifiuto della consegna
Frequently asked questions about Administrative Liability of Entities – Legislative Decree 231/2001
What is corporate administrative liability under Legislative Decree 231/2001?
Legislative Decree 231/2001 introduces an autonomous imputation framework alongside individual criminal liability: a company may be held liable for offences committed in its interest or for its benefit by senior management or subordinates. Sanctions include financial penalties, interdictory measures and confiscation, with direct effects on business continuity.
How is the adequacy of an Organisational Model 231 assessed?
The Organisational, Management and Control Model (MOG) is the exculpatory tool provided by Legislative Decree 231/2001. Its adequacy requires an effective mapping of crime risks, adequate control protocols, an autonomous Supervisory Board, and ongoing training. Adequacy is not measured on paper but on the model's substantial ability to prevent predicate offences.
What interdictory precautionary measures can affect an entity?
In 231 proceedings, a company may be subject to interdictory precautionary measures such as suspension of activities, prohibition from contracting with public authorities, exclusion from public subsidies and financing, and prohibition from advertising goods and services. The defence verifies the existence of serious indicia of liability and the concrete risk of reoffending.
How is the Supervisory Board structured and what are its requirements?
The Supervisory Board (OdV) must have autonomy, independence, professional competence and continuity of action. It may be single-member or collegial; in SMEs, it may coincide with the board of statutory auditors. The OdV supervises the effectiveness of the Model, receives reports, proposes updates and reports to corporate bodies. Its composition and functioning directly affect the exculpatory defence under Legislative Decree 231/2001.
Does the Model 231 also protect small and medium enterprises?
Legislative Decree 231/2001 applies to all entities — including SMEs — that have legal personality or are otherwise endowed with autonomous assets. For SMEs, a simplified OdV structure (even single-member) is permitted, and a Model proportionate to the size and operational complexity of the entity is acceptable. A poorly calibrated or merely formal Model may not produce the exculpatory effect, exposing the company to sanctions.
Request a confidential consultation
Every request is handled with the utmost discretion and professional confidentiality.